CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of UNAFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for UNAFold & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric UNAFold Afold
MCC 0.412 > 0.408
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.510 ± 0.073 > 0.476 ± 0.076
Sensitivity 0.367 < 0.368
Positive Predictive Value 0.463 > 0.453
Total TP 2063 < 2068
Total TN 14427917 > 14427815
Total FP 2579 < 2672
Total FP CONTRA 329 < 352
Total FP INCONS 2067 < 2141
Total FP COMP 183 > 179
Total FN 3556 > 3551
P-value 1.10039559051e-07

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of UNAFold and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and Afold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and Afold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for UNAFold and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and Afold).

^top





Performance of UNAFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2063
Total TN 14427917
Total FP 2579
Total FP CONTRA 329
Total FP INCONS 2067
Total FP COMP 183
Total FN 3556
Total Scores
MCC 0.412
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.510 ± 0.073
Sensitivity 0.367
Positive Predictive Value 0.463
Nr of predictions 54

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KFC_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 623 7 0 7 0 20
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
2LKR_A - 0.93 0.87 1.00 34 6071 1 0 0 1 5
2M58_A - 0.51 0.41 0.64 7 1642 4 1 3 0 10
2RP0_A - 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 346 0 0 0 0 7
2WDL_A - 0.40 0.34 0.47 415 3937338 469 30 438 1 789
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 13 5 3 5 7
2WW9_F - 0.59 0.60 0.60 6 290 4 0 4 0 4
2WW9_D - 0.18 0.12 0.30 3 1943 7 3 4 0 23
2WW9_E - 0.53 0.29 1.00 4 557 0 0 0 0 10
2ZZM_B 0.21 0.19 0.25 6 3462 18 0 18 0 26
2ZZN_D 0.84 0.78 0.91 21 2462 2 0 2 0 6
3A2K_C 0.42 0.39 0.46 11 2902 13 2 11 0 17
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3ADB_C - 0.80 0.74 0.88 28 4154 4 0 4 0 10
3AKZ_H 0.43 0.39 0.48 11 2678 12 2 10 0 17
3AM1_B - 0.68 0.63 0.73 22 3210 8 1 7 0 13
3G4S_9 0.50 0.39 0.67 22 7348 11 1 10 0 35
3GCA_A - 0.54 0.29 1.00 5 523 0 0 0 0 12
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IWN_A 0.74 0.67 0.81 22 4251 6 0 5 1 11
3IYQ_A 0.31 0.33 0.28 31 60617 82 22 56 4 63
3IZ4_A 0.51 0.45 0.58 60 70772 50 4 40 6 72
3IZF_C 0.70 0.61 0.80 33 6862 8 1 7 0 21
3J0L_7 - 0.48 0.41 0.58 7 1213 5 0 5 0 10
3J2C_O - 0.52 0.44 0.61 28 10250 19 0 18 1 35
3J3E_8 0.10 0.09 0.12 3 7477 32 2 21 9 30
3JYV_7 0.22 0.19 0.29 6 2829 15 0 15 0 26
3JYX_3 0.62 0.63 0.61 17 6300 22 1 10 11 10
3JYX_5 - 0.31 0.31 0.31 277 5021967 702 167 454 81 616
3JYX_4 0.32 0.30 0.34 10 12217 31 3 16 12 23
3KIY_A - 0.41 0.35 0.48 429 4053241 467 22 436 9 812
3KTW_C - 0.77 0.65 0.90 28 4529 4 2 1 1 15
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NDB_M - 0.84 0.74 0.96 45 9133 3 0 2 1 16
3NKB_B - 0.59 0.54 0.67 14 1995 7 0 7 0 12
3NPB_A 0.78 0.65 0.94 30 6989 5 0 2 3 16
3O58_2 0.71 0.71 0.71 27 7222 12 4 7 1 11
3O58_3 0.35 0.34 0.35 12 12369 33 1 21 11 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3W3S_B 0.56 0.50 0.63 20 4721 13 1 11 1 20
3ZEX_B - 0.31 0.28 0.35 154 1071936 301 33 257 11 404
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2617 11 2 9 0 12
3ZEX_D 0.77 0.65 0.91 32 6986 3 0 3 0 17
3ZEX_H - 0.18 0.18 0.18 7 9006 32 6 26 0 31
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21893 54 4 48 2 77
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 42 5 26 11 28
4ATO_G - 0.32 0.30 0.38 3 520 5 1 4 0 7
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4FNJ_A - 0.79 0.63 1.00 10 585 0 0 0 0 6
4JRC_A - 0.29 0.26 0.35 6 1523 11 0 11 0 17

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2068
Total TN 14427815
Total FP 2672
Total FP CONTRA 352
Total FP INCONS 2141
Total FP COMP 179
Total FN 3551
Total Scores
MCC 0.408
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.476 ± 0.076
Sensitivity 0.368
Positive Predictive Value 0.453
Nr of predictions 54

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KFC_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 622 8 0 8 0 20
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 6 0 5 1 9
2LKR_A - 0.93 0.87 1.00 34 6071 3 0 0 3 5
2M58_A - 0.33 0.29 0.38 5 1640 8 1 7 0 12
2RP0_A - 0.58 0.42 0.83 5 345 1 0 1 0 7
2WDL_A - 0.43 0.37 0.50 447 3937333 444 31 410 3 757
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 13 5 3 5 7
2WW9_F - 0.59 0.60 0.60 6 290 4 0 4 0 4
2WW9_D - 0.18 0.15 0.24 4 1936 13 0 13 0 22
2WW9_E - 0.47 0.29 0.80 4 556 1 0 1 0 10
2ZZM_B 0.21 0.19 0.25 6 3462 18 0 18 0 26
2ZZN_D 0.80 0.74 0.87 20 2462 3 0 3 0 7
3A2K_C 0.41 0.39 0.44 11 2901 14 2 12 0 17
3A3A_A 0.84 0.70 1.00 26 3629 0 0 0 0 11
3ADB_C - 0.78 0.74 0.82 28 4152 6 0 6 0 10
3AKZ_H 0.16 0.14 0.19 4 2680 17 2 15 0 24
3AM1_B - 0.72 0.66 0.79 23 3211 6 0 6 0 12
3G4S_9 0.48 0.35 0.67 20 7351 11 1 9 1 37
3GCA_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 519 9 0 9 0 17
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IWN_A 0.62 0.58 0.68 19 4250 9 0 9 0 14
3IYQ_A 0.31 0.34 0.29 32 60616 82 23 55 4 62
3IZ4_A 0.48 0.45 0.51 59 70760 58 11 46 1 73
3IZF_C 0.66 0.57 0.76 31 6862 10 1 9 0 23
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1210 15 1 14 0 17
3J2C_O - 0.58 0.49 0.69 31 10251 15 1 13 1 32
3J3E_8 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 7477 31 2 19 10 28
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2827 23 1 22 0 32
3JYX_3 0.54 0.56 0.54 15 6300 24 1 12 11 12
3JYX_5 - 0.29 0.30 0.29 268 5021928 735 179 490 66 625
3JYX_4 0.31 0.30 0.31 10 12214 35 5 17 13 23
3KIY_A - 0.43 0.36 0.50 449 4053235 456 24 420 12 792
3KTW_C - 0.71 0.63 0.82 27 4527 7 2 4 1 16
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NDB_M - 0.84 0.74 0.96 45 9133 3 0 2 1 16
3NKB_B - 0.59 0.54 0.67 14 1995 7 0 7 0 12
3NPB_A 0.74 0.61 0.90 28 6990 5 0 3 2 18
3O58_2 0.66 0.66 0.66 25 7222 14 4 9 1 13
3O58_3 0.34 0.34 0.34 12 12368 37 2 21 14 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3W3S_B 0.50 0.45 0.56 18 4721 15 1 13 1 22
3ZEX_B - 0.29 0.26 0.32 147 1071922 322 35 276 11 411
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2617 12 2 9 1 12
3ZEX_D 0.72 0.61 0.86 30 6986 5 0 5 0 19
3ZEX_H - 0.18 0.18 0.18 7 9006 33 6 26 1 31
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21892 55 2 51 2 77
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 43 5 26 12 28
4ATO_G - 0.32 0.30 0.38 3 520 6 1 4 1 7
4ENB_A 0.67 0.58 0.79 11 1261 3 1 2 0 8
4FNJ_A - 0.75 0.63 0.91 10 584 1 0 1 0 6
4JRC_A - 0.24 0.22 0.29 5 1523 12 0 12 0 18

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.