CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of UNAFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for UNAFold & Murlet(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric UNAFold Murlet(seed)
MCC 0.536 > 0.448
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.118 > 0.445 ± 0.064
Sensitivity 0.466 > 0.245
Positive Predictive Value 0.622 < 0.825
Total TP 394 > 207
Total TN 137971 < 138353
Total FP 318 > 51
Total FP CONTRA 27 > 6
Total FP INCONS 212 > 38
Total FP COMP 79 > 7
Total FN 452 < 639
P-value 5.1503931209e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of UNAFold and Murlet(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and Murlet(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and Murlet(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for UNAFold and Murlet(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and Murlet(seed)).

^top





Performance of UNAFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 394
Total TN 137971
Total FP 318
Total FP CONTRA 27
Total FP INCONS 212
Total FP COMP 79
Total FN 452
Total Scores
MCC 0.536
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.118
Sensitivity 0.466
Positive Predictive Value 0.622
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3GX2_A 0.68 0.55 0.85 22 4345 5 0 4 1 18
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3J3E_8 0.10 0.09 0.12 3 7477 32 2 21 9 30
3J3F_8 0.30 0.31 0.29 11 12208 41 4 23 14 25
3JYX_4 0.32 0.30 0.34 10 12217 31 3 16 12 23
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.78 0.65 0.94 30 6989 5 0 2 3 16
3O58_3 0.35 0.34 0.35 12 12369 33 1 21 11 23
3PDR_A 0.77 0.64 0.94 46 12831 5 0 3 2 26
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.64 0.52 0.79 22 3888 6 1 5 0 20
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3W3S_B 0.56 0.50 0.63 20 4721 13 1 11 1 20
3ZEX_C 0.24 0.21 0.28 11 14157 42 1 27 14 41
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 42 5 26 11 28
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.32 0.26 0.42 5 1314 7 1 6 0 14
4FRG_B 0.32 0.28 0.38 9 3462 15 0 15 0 23
4FRN_A 0.43 0.36 0.52 13 5126 12 2 10 0 23
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top



Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 207
Total TN 138353
Total FP 51
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 38
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 639
Total Scores
MCC 0.448
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.445 ± 0.064
Sensitivity 0.245
Positive Predictive Value 0.825
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.52 0.27 1.00 3 403 0 0 0 0 8
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1528 12 0 12 0 20
3A3A_A 0.57 0.32 1.00 12 3643 0 0 0 0 25
3GX2_A 0.59 0.35 1.00 14 4357 1 0 0 1 26
3IVN_B 0.53 0.39 0.75 12 2330 4 2 2 0 19
3J3E_8 0.25 0.06 1.00 2 7501 2 0 0 2 31
3J3F_8 0.44 0.19 1.00 7 12239 0 0 0 0 29
3JYX_4 0.23 0.09 0.60 3 12241 4 0 2 2 30
3LA5_A 0.58 0.41 0.82 14 2468 3 1 2 0 20
3NPB_A 0.49 0.28 0.87 13 7006 2 1 1 0 33
3O58_3 0.45 0.20 1.00 7 12396 0 0 0 0 28
3PDR_A 0.44 0.19 1.00 14 12866 0 0 0 0 58
3RKF_A 0.53 0.35 0.80 12 2196 3 1 2 0 22
3SD1_A 0.47 0.26 0.85 11 3903 2 0 2 0 31
3W1K_J 0.43 0.21 0.89 8 4177 1 0 1 0 30
3W3S_B 0.41 0.23 0.75 9 4741 3 0 3 0 31
3ZEX_C 0.37 0.13 1.00 7 14189 0 0 0 0 45
4A1C_2 0.46 0.21 1.00 7 11774 0 0 0 0 26
4AOB_A 0.58 0.33 1.00 14 4357 1 0 0 1 28
4ENB_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1269 0 0 0 0 13
4ENC_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1320 0 0 0 0 13
4FRG_B 0.15 0.09 0.25 3 3474 9 0 9 0 29
4FRN_A 0.58 0.39 0.88 14 5135 2 1 1 0 22
4JF2_A 0.51 0.29 0.90 9 2840 2 0 1 1 22

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.