CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of UNAFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for UNAFold & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric UNAFold PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.494 > 0.148
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.481 ± 0.096 > 0.063 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.431 > 0.032
Positive Predictive Value 0.573 < 0.689
Total TP 416 > 31
Total TN 137403 < 138084
Total FP 367 > 75
Total FP CONTRA 28 > 0
Total FP INCONS 282 > 14
Total FP COMP 57 < 61
Total FN 549 < 934
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of UNAFold and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and PPfold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for UNAFold and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of UNAFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 416
Total TN 137403
Total FP 367
Total FP CONTRA 28
Total FP INCONS 282
Total FP COMP 57
Total FN 549
Total Scores
MCC 0.494
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.481 ± 0.096
Sensitivity 0.431
Positive Predictive Value 0.573
Nr of predictions 27

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3J16_L 0.26 0.23 0.30 7 2752 16 1 15 0 23
3J20_1 0.73 0.70 0.76 16 2905 5 0 5 0 7
3J20_0 0.43 0.40 0.48 12 2825 14 0 13 1 18
3J2L_3 0.62 0.53 0.74 28 7837 12 0 10 2 25
3J3D_C 0.28 0.25 0.32 7 2753 15 1 14 0 21
3J3E_8 0.10 0.09 0.12 3 7477 32 2 21 9 30
3J3E_7 0.45 0.37 0.56 20 7104 16 1 15 0 34
3J3F_7 0.73 0.62 0.86 31 7224 6 0 5 1 19
3J3F_8 0.30 0.31 0.29 11 12208 41 4 23 14 25
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.64 0.52 0.79 22 3888 6 1 5 0 20
3UZL_B 0.48 0.38 0.61 14 3547 9 0 9 0 23
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3W3S_B 0.56 0.50 0.63 20 4721 13 1 11 1 20
3ZEX_C 0.24 0.21 0.28 11 14157 42 1 27 14 41
3ZEX_D 0.77 0.65 0.91 32 6986 3 0 3 0 17
3ZND_W 0.21 0.22 0.21 5 2979 20 1 18 1 18
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.82 32 7101 7 1 6 0 22
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 42 5 26 11 28
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.32 0.26 0.42 5 1314 7 1 6 0 14
4FRG_B 0.32 0.28 0.38 9 3462 15 0 15 0 23
4FRN_A 0.43 0.36 0.52 13 5126 12 2 10 0 23
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 31
Total TN 138084
Total FP 75
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 14
Total FP COMP 61
Total FN 934
Total Scores
MCC 0.148
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.063 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.032
Positive Predictive Value 0.689
Nr of predictions 27

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.30 0.75 6 1532 2 0 2 0 14
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3003 0 0 0 0 27
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2775 0 0 0 0 30
3J20_1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2926 0 0 0 0 23
3J20_0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2850 0 0 0 0 30
3J2L_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7875 0 0 0 0 53
3J3D_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2775 0 0 0 0 28
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7503 6 0 0 6 33
3J3E_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
3J3F_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7260 0 0 0 0 50
3J3F_8 0.23 0.11 0.50 4 12238 22 0 4 18 32
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2211 0 0 0 0 34
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3916 0 0 0 0 42
3UZL_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3570 0 0 0 0 37
3W1K_J 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4186 0 0 0 0 38
3W3S_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4753 0 0 0 0 40
3ZEX_C 0.20 0.08 0.50 4 14188 22 0 4 18 48
3ZEX_D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7021 0 0 0 0 49
3ZND_W 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3003 0 0 0 0 23
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
4A1C_2 0.08 0.03 0.20 1 11776 23 0 4 19 32
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 42
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1275 0 0 0 0 19
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1326 0 0 0 0 19
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3486 0 0 0 0 32
4FRN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5151 0 0 0 0 36
4JF2_A 0.72 0.52 1.00 16 2834 0 0 0 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.