CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of UNAFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for UNAFold & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric UNAFold RNAwolf
MCC 0.446 > 0.317
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.452 ± 0.075 > 0.342 ± 0.075
Sensitivity 0.390 > 0.293
Positive Predictive Value 0.512 > 0.344
Total TP 1128 > 849
Total TN 2521584 > 2521319
Total FP 1162 < 1693
Total FP CONTRA 104 < 186
Total FP INCONS 970 < 1432
Total FP COMP 88 > 75
Total FN 1768 < 2047
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of UNAFold and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and RNAwolf).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and RNAwolf).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for UNAFold and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of UNAFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1128
Total TN 2521584
Total FP 1162
Total FP CONTRA 104
Total FP INCONS 970
Total FP COMP 88
Total FN 1768
Total Scores
MCC 0.446
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.452 ± 0.075
Sensitivity 0.390
Positive Predictive Value 0.512
Nr of predictions 46

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
2LKR_A - 0.93 0.87 1.00 34 6071 1 0 0 1 5
2M58_A - 0.51 0.41 0.64 7 1642 4 1 3 0 10
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_a - 0.51 0.50 0.53 8 1113 7 3 4 0 8
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.24 0.26 8 6185 25 2 21 2 25
3J0L_7 - 0.48 0.41 0.58 7 1213 5 0 5 0 10
3J16_L 0.26 0.23 0.30 7 2752 16 1 15 0 23
3J20_1 0.73 0.70 0.76 16 2905 5 0 5 0 7
3J20_2 0.47 0.41 0.53 260 1116278 230 15 212 3 373
3J20_0 0.43 0.40 0.48 12 2825 14 0 13 1 18
3J2C_O - 0.52 0.44 0.61 28 10250 19 0 18 1 35
3J2C_M - 0.56 0.46 0.69 96 106351 49 7 37 5 111
3J2L_3 0.62 0.53 0.74 28 7837 12 0 10 2 25
3J3D_C 0.28 0.25 0.32 7 2753 15 1 14 0 21
3J3E_7 0.45 0.37 0.56 20 7104 16 1 15 0 34
3J3E_8 0.10 0.09 0.12 3 7477 32 2 21 9 30
3J3F_8 0.30 0.31 0.29 11 12208 41 4 23 14 25
3J3F_7 0.73 0.62 0.86 31 7224 6 0 5 1 19
3J3V_B 0.55 0.44 0.69 25 6985 11 1 10 0 32
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.64 0.52 0.79 22 3888 6 1 5 0 20
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3UZL_B 0.48 0.38 0.61 14 3547 9 0 9 0 23
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3W3S_B 0.56 0.50 0.63 20 4721 13 1 11 1 20
3ZEX_B - 0.31 0.28 0.35 154 1071936 301 33 257 11 404
3ZEX_D 0.77 0.65 0.91 32 6986 3 0 3 0 17
3ZEX_G - 0.75 0.64 0.89 47 16418 12 0 6 6 27
3ZEX_H - 0.18 0.18 0.18 7 9006 32 6 26 0 31
3ZEX_C 0.24 0.21 0.28 11 14157 42 1 27 14 41
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2617 11 2 9 0 12
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21893 54 4 48 2 77
3ZND_W 0.21 0.22 0.21 5 2979 20 1 18 1 18
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.82 32 7101 7 1 6 0 22
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 42 5 26 11 28
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ATO_G - 0.32 0.30 0.38 3 520 5 1 4 0 7
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.32 0.26 0.42 5 1314 7 1 6 0 14
4FNJ_A - 0.79 0.63 1.00 10 585 0 0 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.32 0.28 0.38 9 3462 15 0 15 0 23
4FRN_A 0.43 0.36 0.52 13 5126 12 2 10 0 23
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12
4JRC_A - 0.29 0.26 0.35 6 1523 11 0 11 0 17

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 849
Total TN 2521319
Total FP 1693
Total FP CONTRA 186
Total FP INCONS 1432
Total FP COMP 75
Total FN 2047
Total Scores
MCC 0.317
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.342 ± 0.075
Sensitivity 0.293
Positive Predictive Value 0.344
Nr of predictions 46

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 10 1522 8 0 8 0 10
2LKR_A - 0.81 0.74 0.88 29 6072 8 0 4 4 10
2M58_A - 0.51 0.47 0.57 8 1639 6 3 3 0 9
3AMU_B 0.68 0.63 0.74 17 2980 9 0 6 3 10
3J0L_g - 0.16 0.25 0.11 1 456 8 6 2 0 3
3J0L_a - 0.18 0.19 0.20 3 1113 12 1 11 0 13
3J0L_2 - 0.11 0.12 0.11 4 6181 34 5 26 3 29
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1214 11 0 11 0 17
3J16_L 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2752 11 0 11 0 18
3J20_1 0.46 0.52 0.41 12 2897 17 6 11 0 11
3J20_2 0.45 0.42 0.49 266 1116224 283 17 258 8 367
3J20_0 0.40 0.40 0.41 12 2821 18 0 17 1 18
3J2C_O - 0.40 0.37 0.44 23 10244 30 0 29 1 40
3J2C_M - 0.19 0.17 0.21 35 106323 133 11 122 0 172
3J2L_3 0.55 0.49 0.62 26 7833 18 0 16 2 27
3J3D_C 0.79 0.75 0.84 21 2750 5 2 2 1 7
3J3E_7 0.41 0.35 0.49 19 7101 20 1 19 0 35
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7470 42 4 29 9 33
3J3F_8 0.23 0.25 0.21 9 12204 45 5 28 12 27
3J3F_7 0.21 0.20 0.23 10 7216 34 2 32 0 40
3J3V_B 0.43 0.37 0.51 21 6980 20 2 18 0 36
3RKF_A 0.72 0.62 0.84 21 2186 4 0 4 0 13
3SD1_A 0.46 0.43 0.50 18 3880 18 0 18 0 24
3U4M_B - 0.44 0.38 0.52 14 3133 13 0 13 0 23
3UZL_B 0.72 0.59 0.88 22 3545 4 1 2 1 15
3W1K_J 0.71 0.66 0.78 25 4154 7 0 7 0 13
3W3S_B 0.68 0.63 0.74 25 4719 10 0 9 1 15
3ZEX_B - 0.14 0.13 0.15 70 1071902 417 55 353 9 488
3ZEX_D 0.20 0.18 0.22 9 6980 32 3 29 0 40
3ZEX_G - 0.20 0.18 0.23 13 16415 43 6 37 0 61
3ZEX_H - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 9006 40 8 31 1 38
3ZEX_C 0.05 0.06 0.06 3 14144 49 12 37 0 49
3ZEX_F - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2613 20 6 9 5 12
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21876 69 10 59 0 77
3ZND_W 0.50 0.48 0.52 11 2982 13 0 10 3 12
4A1C_3 0.23 0.20 0.28 11 7101 28 2 26 0 43
4A1C_2 0.08 0.09 0.08 3 11741 46 10 27 9 30
4AOB_A 0.23 0.19 0.30 8 4344 20 1 18 1 34
4ATO_G - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 520 8 1 7 0 10
4ENB_A 0.35 0.32 0.40 6 1260 9 1 8 0 13
4ENC_A 0.34 0.32 0.38 6 1310 10 1 9 0 13
4FNJ_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 587 8 0 8 0 16
4FRG_B 0.56 0.50 0.64 16 3461 10 1 8 1 16
4FRN_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 5119 32 0 32 0 36
4JF2_A 0.67 0.58 0.78 18 2827 5 3 2 0 13
4JRC_A - 0.58 0.52 0.67 12 1522 6 0 6 0 11

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.