CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Vsfold4 - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Vsfold4 & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Vsfold4 PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.474 > 0.152
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.494 ± 0.100 > 0.062 ± 0.074
Sensitivity 0.392 > 0.032
Positive Predictive Value 0.581 < 0.730
Total TP 329 > 27
Total TN 114030 < 114559
Total FP 279 > 53
Total FP CONTRA 16 > 0
Total FP INCONS 221 > 10
Total FP COMP 42 < 43
Total FN 510 < 812
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Vsfold4 and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold4 and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold4 and PPfold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Vsfold4 and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold4 and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of Vsfold4 - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold4

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 329
Total TN 114030
Total FP 279
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 221
Total FP COMP 42
Total FN 510
Total Scores
MCC 0.474
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.494 ± 0.100
Sensitivity 0.392
Positive Predictive Value 0.581
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold4 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1527 13 0 13 0 20
3AMU_B 0.64 0.56 0.75 15 2983 7 0 5 2 12
3J16_L 0.82 0.67 1.00 20 2755 0 0 0 0 10
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J20_1 0.71 0.70 0.73 16 2904 6 0 6 0 7
3J2L_3 0.57 0.45 0.73 24 7842 12 1 8 3 29
3J3D_C 0.44 0.39 0.50 11 2753 11 1 10 0 17
3J3E_7 0.48 0.35 0.66 19 7111 10 0 10 0 35
3J3E_8 0.07 0.06 0.09 2 7481 32 2 18 12 31
3J3F_8 0.33 0.31 0.37 11 12216 27 4 15 8 25
3J3F_7 0.21 0.18 0.26 9 7226 25 0 25 0 41
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.19 0.17 0.24 7 3887 22 1 21 0 35
3UZL_B 0.53 0.41 0.71 15 3549 6 1 5 0 22
3W3S_B 0.67 0.58 0.79 23 4724 7 0 6 1 17
3ZEX_D 0.55 0.45 0.69 22 6989 10 0 10 0 27
3ZND_W 0.41 0.39 0.43 9 2982 14 2 10 2 14
4A1C_3 0.26 0.22 0.32 12 7103 25 2 23 0 42
4A1C_2 0.28 0.24 0.33 8 11757 28 0 16 12 25
4AOB_A 0.42 0.33 0.54 14 4345 13 1 11 1 28
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1317 0 0 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.56 0.47 0.68 15 3464 7 1 6 0 17
4JF2_A 0.66 0.52 0.84 16 2831 3 0 3 0 15

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 27
Total TN 114559
Total FP 53
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 10
Total FP COMP 43
Total FN 812
Total Scores
MCC 0.152
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.062 ± 0.074
Sensitivity 0.032
Positive Predictive Value 0.730
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.30 0.75 6 1532 2 0 2 0 14
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3003 0 0 0 0 27
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2775 0 0 0 0 30
3J20_0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2850 0 0 0 0 30
3J20_1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2926 0 0 0 0 23
3J2L_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7875 0 0 0 0 53
3J3D_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2775 0 0 0 0 28
3J3E_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7503 6 0 0 6 33
3J3F_8 0.23 0.11 0.50 4 12238 22 0 4 18 32
3J3F_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7260 0 0 0 0 50
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2211 0 0 0 0 34
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3916 0 0 0 0 42
3UZL_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3570 0 0 0 0 37
3W3S_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4753 0 0 0 0 40
3ZEX_D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7021 0 0 0 0 49
3ZND_W 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3003 0 0 0 0 23
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
4A1C_2 0.08 0.03 0.20 1 11776 23 0 4 19 32
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 42
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1275 0 0 0 0 19
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1326 0 0 0 0 19
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3486 0 0 0 0 32
4JF2_A 0.72 0.52 1.00 16 2834 0 0 0 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.