CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Vsfold5 - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Vsfold5 & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Vsfold5 PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.427 > 0.149
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.454 ± 0.121 > 0.060 ± 0.071
Sensitivity 0.367 > 0.031
Positive Predictive Value 0.505 < 0.730
Total TP 321 > 27
Total TN 119111 < 119710
Total FP 355 > 53
Total FP CONTRA 28 > 0
Total FP INCONS 287 > 10
Total FP COMP 40 < 43
Total FN 554 < 848
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Vsfold5 and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold5 and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold5 and PPfold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Vsfold5 and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold5 and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of Vsfold5 - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold5

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 321
Total TN 119111
Total FP 355
Total FP CONTRA 28
Total FP INCONS 287
Total FP COMP 40
Total FN 554
Total Scores
MCC 0.427
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.454 ± 0.121
Sensitivity 0.367
Positive Predictive Value 0.505
Nr of predictions 25

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold5 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1527 13 0 13 0 20
3AMU_B 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2982 7 0 5 2 11
3J16_L 0.82 0.67 1.00 20 2755 0 0 0 0 10
3J20_0 0.67 0.57 0.81 17 2829 5 1 3 1 13
3J20_1 0.71 0.70 0.73 16 2904 6 0 6 0 7
3J2L_3 0.56 0.45 0.71 24 7841 13 1 9 3 29
3J3D_C 0.60 0.54 0.68 15 2753 7 0 7 0 13
3J3E_7 0.47 0.37 0.61 20 7107 13 0 13 0 34
3J3E_8 0.06 0.06 0.08 2 7477 31 5 19 7 31
3J3F_8 0.33 0.33 0.33 12 12210 35 5 19 11 24
3J3F_7 0.21 0.18 0.26 9 7226 25 1 24 0 41
3RKF_A 0.75 0.65 0.88 22 2186 3 0 3 0 12
3SD1_A 0.11 0.10 0.15 4 3890 22 0 22 0 38
3UZL_B 0.16 0.14 0.20 5 3545 20 1 19 0 32
3W3S_B 0.76 0.70 0.82 28 4719 7 1 5 1 12
3ZEX_D 0.08 0.06 0.11 3 6994 24 0 24 0 46
3ZND_W 0.41 0.39 0.43 9 2982 14 2 10 2 14
4A1C_3 0.26 0.22 0.32 12 7103 25 2 23 0 42
4A1C_2 0.24 0.24 0.24 8 11748 37 3 22 12 25
4AOB_A 0.18 0.14 0.25 6 4347 19 1 17 1 36
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.56 0.47 0.68 15 3464 7 1 6 0 17
4FRN_A 0.13 0.11 0.17 4 5128 19 2 17 0 32
4JF2_A 0.84 0.77 0.92 24 2824 2 1 1 0 7

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 27
Total TN 119710
Total FP 53
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 10
Total FP COMP 43
Total FN 848
Total Scores
MCC 0.149
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.060 ± 0.071
Sensitivity 0.031
Positive Predictive Value 0.730
Nr of predictions 25

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.30 0.75 6 1532 2 0 2 0 14
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3003 0 0 0 0 27
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2775 0 0 0 0 30
3J20_0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2850 0 0 0 0 30
3J20_1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2926 0 0 0 0 23
3J2L_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7875 0 0 0 0 53
3J3D_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2775 0 0 0 0 28
3J3E_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7503 6 0 0 6 33
3J3F_8 0.23 0.11 0.50 4 12238 22 0 4 18 32
3J3F_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7260 0 0 0 0 50
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2211 0 0 0 0 34
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3916 0 0 0 0 42
3UZL_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3570 0 0 0 0 37
3W3S_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4753 0 0 0 0 40
3ZEX_D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7021 0 0 0 0 49
3ZND_W 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3003 0 0 0 0 23
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
4A1C_2 0.08 0.03 0.20 1 11776 23 0 4 19 32
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 42
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1275 0 0 0 0 19
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1326 0 0 0 0 19
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3486 0 0 0 0 32
4FRN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5151 0 0 0 0 36
4JF2_A 0.72 0.52 1.00 16 2834 0 0 0 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.