General Data

RNA Type	tRNA
SOTerm	None
Original Source	3KFU_N
Secondary Structure	(((((((..((((...[..))))..((((.......))))......((((((.].)..)))))))))))).
Sequence (UNICHARACTER ENCODING)	UCCGCGGUAGCUCAGGGDAGAGCAGCCGGCUGUUAACCGGUAGGUCGCAGGTPCGAGUCCUGCCCGCGGAG
Sequence (SHORT NAMES ENCODING)	UCCGCGGUAGCUCAGGGpDAGAGCAGCCGGCUGUUAACCGGUAGGUCGCAGGpm5UpYCGAGUCCUGCCCGCGGAG
Sequence (MODOMICS CODE ENCODING)	UCCGCGGUAGCUCAGGG2000008551UAGAGCAGCCGGCUGUUAACCGGUAGGUCGCAGG2000005551U2000009551UCGAGUCCUGCCCGCGGAG
Consensus Secondary Structure	.(((((((..((((......[....)))).(((((.......)))))........................(((((..]....))))))))))))....
Alignment with Modification	-UCCGCGGUAGCUCAG---GGD--AGAGCAGCCGGCUGUUAACCGGUAGGUC-------------------GCAGGTPCGAGUCCUGCCCGCGGAG---

Score Table

_{Table containing the score explanation. Score identify the level of experimental reliability and evidence so as exaplained in the 2023 release manuscript. Class 1 should be considered as highlyrelevant. Class 2 evidences are considered as Solid, namely large errors are unlikely and minor errors should not undermine the meaning of data. Class 3 is considered as speculative and errors are expected. Class 4 is considered as questionable. Class 5 evidence means that verification and data are still to be collected. Class 6 data cannot be estimated.}

Method Classification	Score
Multiple direct experimental evidence	1
Direct experimental evidence	2
Inferred based on indirect experimental evidence	3
Predicted computationally	4
Evidence not yet annotated (Unknown)	5
Irrelevant	6

RNA-2D Representation

Modification Positions

_{Table containing the original modifications present in the MODOMICS sequences. Edit locations not originally present in the RNA sequences are marked by their source. Their scores are in third row.}

Position in the alignment	20	54	55
Position in the sequence	18	52	53
Modification positions	D	m5U	Y
Level of Experimental Evidence	2	2	2
Level of Experimental Reliability	2	2	2
Source	RCSB	RCSB	RCSB